About Me

Name: Volubrjotr
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Ayatollah Obama: Long Legged Mac Daddy Barack, Does Fairy Tales For America - Taqiyya

“Barack Bombs U.S. History – - Again,”

(AND MOST SLAVES WERE WHITE)

by

Paul L. Williams, Ph.D.

thelastcrusade.org

theshackofmichelleobamasgreatgreatg

Considered a  “Charming, Rustic, Cottage” in Obama’s America

That’s part of the African American experience. You are, in some ways, connected to this distant land, but on the other end, you’re about as American as it gets, In some ways, African Americans are more fundamentally rooted in the American experience because they don’t have a recent immigrant experience to draw on. It’s that unique African American culture that has existed in North America for hundreds of years long before we actually founded the nation.

Barack Obama, July 2009


An African Asks Some Disturbing Questions of Islam

Islam's black slaves

The author of a book on the 1,400-year history of the other slave trade talks about the power of eunuchs, the Nation of Islam's falsehoods and the persistence of slavery today.

In June, President Barack Obama, appearing at the University of Cairo, said: “I know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story. . . And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.”

Muslims have not always been part of America’s story.

No Muslims took part in the Revolutionary War.

No Muslims fought during the Civil War.

No Muslims numbered among the ranks of U.S. soldiers in World War I.

No Muslims served the U.S. military in World War II or the Korean Conflict.

Muslims only became a sizeable and significant after 1965 – - thanks to the revised Immigration and Naturalization Act.

Now Barack has made another historical boo-boo that was not corrected by any silver haired scholar or talking head on cable news. He announced that “unique African American culture existed in North America for hundreds of years before we actually founded the nation.”

Such a statement might be acceptable coming from Uncle Remus but not the President of the United States, who is expected to be somewhat knowledgeable and reasonably intelligent.

The failure of academics and journalists to correct the continuous historical errors of the Commander in Chief may reflect the sorry fact that one in four Americans never cracks open a book or reads a newspaper.

African Americans were not brought here in chains by the Pilgrims and the Puritans. Nor did they number among the Spanish at St. Augustine, the Dutch in New Amsterdam, or the French at Parris Island.

The first black slaves arrived in America in the early years of the 17th Century.

At the time of the ratification of the Constitution in 1788, there were less than 50,000 slaves in America – - and the vast majority of them were white.

Sorry, Barack, but white slavery pre-dates black slavery in America. This fact has been verified by forensic evidence from archaeological digs and historical documents uncovered by contemporary scholars, including Don Jordan and Michael Walsh inWhite Cargo (New York University Press: 2009).

The white slaves, who began to arrive here in 1618, included hundreds of children – - waifs and strays – -  who had been rounded up from streets of London to serve wealthy farmers in Virgina.

Other slaves came from the ranks of the homeless and the poor, whom King James I held responsible for spreading the plague, and from England’s swelling prison population.

The scheme was supported by James I, who believed the homeless and itinerant of London were spreading plague.

Of the first 300 white slaves to land in Virginia, only 12  managed to survive four years. The others died of ill treatment, disease, attack by native Americans or overwork.

Contemporary records show that one child victim, Elizabeth Abbott, was beaten to death when her master ordered her to be given 500 lashes for running away.

At least 70,000 white men, women, and children from England and Ireland were shipped to the colonies to be sold as slaves on the auction block during the 170 years of British rule.

White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America, the white slaves were kept below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. They were chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship’s stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease, including cholera and dysentery.

Ships carrying white slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger of the University of California, Riverside, “Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [white] servants at certain times equaled that for [black] slaves in the ‘middle passage,’ and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves.”

Ms. Salinger affirms a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for black slaves on board ships en route to America compared with a death rate of 25% for white slaves.

Foster R. Dulles in Labor in America writes that white slaves “experienced discomforts and sufferings on their voyage across the Atlantic that paralleled the cruel hardships undergone by African slaves on the notorious Middle Passage.”

Dulles says the whites were “indiscriminately herded aboard the ‘white guinea men,’ often as many as 300 passengers on little vessels of not more than 200 tons burden–overcrowded, unsanitary…The mortality rate was sometimes as high as 50% and young children seldom survived the horrors of a voyage which might last anywhere from seven to twelve weeks.”

Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of white slaves, “The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death.”

In the past, white slavery was acknowledged as having existed in America only as “indentured servitude.”

Such indentured servants were, for the most part, convicts, who served a term of four to seven years laboring on the farms, plantations, and estates in Virginia, Georgia, Maryland, and the Carolinas in exchange for their freedom. But they represented only a small fraction of the hundreds of thousands of whites who remained slaves for life. Such slavery was hereditary: the while children of the white slaves also became chattel without hope of freedom.

In George Sandy’s laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved “forever.” The service of Whites bound to Berkeley’s Hundred was deemed “perpetual.”

Throughout the colonial period, white slaves remained the main labour force on the Virginia and Maryland plantations, outnumbering Africans by as many as four to one.

Benjamin Franklin suggested the American authorities should send rattlesnakes back to England in return for such unwelcome imports.

Whites remained slaves until the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York’s Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship’s hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were African; the men in the hold were Irish.

Olmsted inquired about this to a ship worker. “Oh,” said the worker, “the Africana are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything.”

At present, several African American groups are seeking reparations from the United States government for the time their ancestors spent as slaves. One group, the African World Reparations and Repatriation Truth Commission, is demanding an astronomical $777 trillion.

Ocala’s Trinity United Church of Christ has passed a resolution demanding reparations and declaring that:

WHEREAS: The institution of Slavery is internationally recognized as crime for which there is no statute of limitations, AND

WHEREAS: Uncompensated labor was demanded from enslaved Africans and their descendants for more than two centuries on U.S. soil; AND

WHEREAS: The principle that reparations is the appropriate remedy whenever government unjustly abrogates the rights of a domestic group or foreign people whose rights such government is obligated to protect or uphold has been internationally recognized…”

Michelle Obama, no doubt, expects a sizeable check from Uncle Sam since Jim Robinson, her great-great grandfather worked as a slave on a sprawling rice plantation in Georgetown, South Carolina.

I would like a check in a substantially greater amount for my English and Irish ancestors who were subjected to similar indignities.

Islam and the African Slave trade.

CofCC.org News Team

The Arab slave trade of African African lasted for 1400 years. The European transatlantic African African trade lasted for 300 and only 5% of the slaves were brought to North America. 95% were taken to South America and the Caribbean. Today the descendants of the African African slaves brought to North America have the highest standard of living of any African living anywhere in the world. In fact they are astronomically better than African living in any nation in Africa today.

From A brief for whitey, by Pat Buchanan…

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ’60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks — with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas — to advance black applicants over white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?

Did you know?About half a million African slaves were brought to America, over two million were taken to Brazil. Today tens of millions of descendants of these slaves live in total squalor no different from the worst slums in Africa. They only dream of the plush lifestyle of American blacks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VisRxzrqSU

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BREAKING: "HATE CRIMES" BILL NOT FINAL. F-22 RAPTOR CAN STILL SHOOT POPULATION CONTROL AKA; HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA DOWN IN FLAMES. SPLIT CONFEREES UNDECIDE


f_22_raptor_1

NEW "HATE CRIMES" PETITION!  Please click, sign, and WE WILL FAX your personalized petition automatically to all 88 House & Senate Armed Services Committee Members, (saving you hours of labor)! We already faxed 350,000 petitions to the Senate... together with Worldnet Daily, we sent 1,055,000 petitions...can you reach 1.2 million? Even if you've signed our fax-petition before, you can sign again and we'll re-fax!

BREAKING: "HATE CRIMES" BILL NOT FINAL.  F-22 RAPTOR CAN STILL SHOOT HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA DOWN IN FLAMES.  SPLIT CONFEREES UNDECIDED.

When Sen. Leahy (D-VT) attached the pro-homosexual "Pedophile Protection Act" to the Defense Authorization Act, he imagined zero resistance from House Democrats, or from President Obama.  He failed to realize, however, how the battle to fund the F-22 Raptor jet for our Air Force could shoot the homosexual agenda down in flames.  We have one last chance to stop the "Hate Crimes" bill, by demanding the House Conferees stand firmly by their 389 to 22 vote to fully fund the F-22 fighters.  If they do, President Obama has vowed to veto the entire bill, and kill the pro-homosexual "Hate Crimes" amendment with it.

Furthermore, after our 1,055,000 petitions were read by some Senators, they voted 78-13 to pass Sen. Brownback's good amendment to the Hate Crimes bill, protecting freedom of speech by pastors, stating the federal hate crimes law shall not be "applied … in a manner that infringes" First Amendment rights or that "substantially burdens any exercise of religion … speech, expression, [or] association, if such exercise of religion, speech, expression, or association was not intended to … incite an imminent act of physical violence against another." Sen. Brownback provided additional protection for religious exercise and free speechbeyond the minimum protection that a court may apply.  Your faxes to the Senate helped win this victory! (Much to the dismay of the homosexual lobby, who even now is demanding Conferees undo the good we've done.)

But Conferees have power to strip the Brownback Amendment, which we must protect. And Conferees have power to equip American pilots with F-22 fighter jets, which would guarantee Obama's veto of the entire "Pedophile Protection Amendment."  So we must act, and now petition the House and Senate Armed Services Committees for two things:
1) Keep the good Brownback Amendment, and don't allow it to be stripped in conference.
2) Keep the good F-22's, and equip American pilots with the best fighter jets in the world.
As an Air Force Academy graduate, I can say our military pilots deserves the best jets, which President Obama and some Senators sadly wish to stop funding, even while they load our Pentagon Budget with special rights for homosexuals, pedophiles, and deviants.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT.

What do homosexual rights have to do with Pentagon spending?  Everything, if you're a  Democrat trying to hide an unpopular "pedophile protection" bill from the American people. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) spoke on the floor of the U.S. Senate and argued essentially that since he couldn't get 60 honest votes to pass the "Punish Pastors, Protect Pedophiles" hate crimes S. 909 as a stand-alone bill, it should instead be attached as an amendment to S. 1390, the National Defense Authorization Act. Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) then attached the homosexual bill to the Pentagon budget, without allowing a committee vote.  Only your public outrage allowed Sen. Brownback to protect free speech against sin.

By hiding the hate bill as an amendment to Pentagon spending, moderate Democrats (and all but two Republicans) are faced with a difficult choice: either pass the Pedophile Protection Act or STOP PAYING OUR TROOPS serving overseas.

Senator Leahy (D) Tells Soldier " No Funding Unless You Protect Sodomites"
Senator Leahy (D) Tells Soldiers " No Funding Unless You Protect Sodomites"

Faced with a "poison pill" many moderates may falsely claim they have no choice but to swallow.  Unfortunately all Senate Democrats voted 63-28 with five RINO Republicans (Sens. Voinovich-OH, Lugar-IN, Murkowski-AK, Snowe-ME, Collins-ME), to invoke cloture and end debate on the pro-homosexual bill.  But the Senate and House verison don't agree, so Conferees will meet to further amend this bill.

TAKE ACTION RIGHT NOW:

So let's all telephone all members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, whose members will send conferees.  Their phone numbers arehere and here.  Let's tell them to strip all homosexual rights from the Defense Authorization Act, please fund F-22's, or at least keep the Brownback Amendment which protects pastors freedom of religious speech. 

But remember, 100 emails = 10 phone calls = 1 fax in political capital, since the Senate staffers must handle each paper and write a reply to their home-state constituents.  So please join our automated fax-petition campaign first, and we will fax your personalized petition to all 88 members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. 

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings in late June on Senator Ted Kennedy's "Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” (better known to conservatives as the "Pedophile Protection Act") but never voted on the stand-alone bill S.909, instead Sens. Leahy and Levin stuffed it into the Pentagon Budget.  The bill broadly defines many "sexual orientations" requiring protection by federal prosecutors, and if the Brownback amendment gets stripped in conference, it will also endanger free speech by pastors who criticize sin.
 

547 SEXUAL DEVIANCES TO BE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL MARSHALS

The bad Leahy "Hate Crimes" Amendment to the Pentagon Budget S. 1390 mirrored a House bill H.R. 1913, already passed 249-175 along strict party lines, which makes "sexual orientation," "gender," and "gender identity" into federally-protected classes under the law, and protects up to 547 types of sexually deviant behaviors, including: 

Incest – sex with one’s offspring (a crime, of course) 
Necrophilia – sexual relations with a corpse, also a crime 
Pedophilia – sex with an underage child, another crime 
Voyeurism – a criminal offense in most states 
Fronteurism – a man rubbing against an unknown woman’s buttocks 
Coprophilia – sexual arousal from feces 
Urophilia – sexual arousal from urine 

Attempts by House Republicans to add amendments stating "pedophilia is not protected as a sexual orientation" were specifically blocked and defeated by House Democrats.  Lesbian Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) expressed opposition to excluding pedophiles from the bill, and Democrats voted with her to strike any child-protection amendment. She claimed that pedophiles would not be defined within “sexual orientation,” but wouldn't put that in writing, and refused to define that phrase "sexual orientation," which Congressman Steve King (R-IA) said will include all 547 sexual deviances listed in the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-III manual of clinical psychoses, including pedophilia, so now thanks to most Democrats, child molesters will be protected by federal law.

In response on the House floor, Congressman Alcee Hastings (D-FL) not only admitted it would, but defended that all 547 psychoses SHOULD be defended by this new law, saying, "This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these 'Philias' and fetishes and 'isms' that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule."

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT.

QUOTING THE BIBLE IN CHURCH WILL BE PUNISHED

If Conferees strip the good Brownback Amendment to the bad "Hate Crimes" Bill, not only will sexually deviant behaviors gain legal protection, this legislation also lays the legal foundation to investigate, prosecute and persecute pastors, youth pastors, Bible teachers, and anyone else whose speech and thought is based upon and reflects the truths found in the Bible. How will this legislation over-rule the First Amendment?

PATRICK LEAHY PRO POPULATION CONTROL BY SODOMY ACTIVIST
PATRICK LEAHY PRO POPULATION CONTROL BY SODOMY.

PASTORS NOT PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT

S. 909 broadly defines "intimidation," thus a pastor's sermon could be seen as "hate speech" if heard by an individual who then acts aggressively against persons based on any "sexual orientation." The pastor could be prosecuted for "conspiracy to commit a hate crime" or for "inciting violence against gays" simply by quoting the Bible in church.  And the First Amendment won’t automatically protect pastors, since speech accused of "inciting violence" is not protected, and is punishable, under precedent of Supreme Court rulings.In 1993 Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a "hate speech" law providing enhanced punishments for violent crimes based on racial motives as revealed by speech of the accused, (which would now apply broadly to punish any "anti-gay motives" in the speech of accused pastor "co-conspirators.")  But pastor, if a crazy person in your audience commits a crime against a heterosexual, don't worry, you'll get a comparative discount in your prison time.

IS PRAYER IN JESUS’ NAME A "HATE CRIME?"

Any public prayer against the sin of homosexuality could be construed as "inciting violence" by easily offended listeners, especially if those prayers are offered "in Jesus name."  When I served our country as a former Navy Chaplain, for example, I was told in writing by Chief of Chaplains Rear-Admiral Louis Iasiello, that "any chaplain’s continued insistence on ending public prayers ‘in Jesus’ name’…could reasonably tend to denigrate those with different forms of faith."  His policy prohibiting prayers "in Jesus name" was enforced against me at court-martial, before it was later rescinded by Congress in 2006. But this year I’ve already been falsely accused of "inciting violence" because I quoted verbatim from Psalm 109 in my public prayers, (for which secular activist Mikey Weinstein literally requested an FBI investigation against me!)  Just imagine more anti-Christian aggression by law enforcement officials AFTER this hate-crimes bill becomes law.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT.

IS PREACHING AGAINST SIN A HATE CRIME?

As a former Navy Chaplain who was punished (in writing, three times) for quoting the Bible in chapel during optionally-attended worship, I know exactly how they'll come after us. The enemies of religious liberty will simply declare certain gospel phrases "hateful" and "offensive" like my commanding officer who punished mefor quoting John 3:36 in chapel, and was supported by government lawyers for "protecting" easily offended listeners from the "offensive" gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ.

Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) agrees with me, saying pastors, rabbis, or imams could be charged with encouraging or inducing a "hate crime" if they preach against homosexuality.  "Every preacher of the gospel, unless you cut out parts of it; every imam who mentions anything with regard to sexual immorality — they could be pursued, and in other countries they have been," says Gohmert.  (Congressmen Gohmert is my personal advocate, with whom I preached last year at a pro-faith rally in Texas...and we both agree the gospel of freedom from sin really is "love speech" not "hate speech.")

FREE SPEECH SUPPRESSED IN NORWAY

Hate crimes laws protecting homosexuals from criticism are already silencing pastors in Norway, where these dangerous laws specifically empower law enforcement officials to prosecute "intimidation" of homosexuals. For example, Congressman Gohmert warned "I was talking to a guy from Norway who was telling me that people are even afraid to say Mary was a virgin, because just bringing up sexuality at all can raise problems with law enforcement."

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT. 

FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN SWEDEN

In Sweden, Pastor Ake Green received a one-month jail sentence last year under a Swedish "hate crimes" law that forbids criticism of those who participate in homosexual behavior. The Goeta Appeals Court later overturned the decision.  The government demanded the pastor be punished by appealing the case to the Swedish Supreme Court, which ruled the law unconstitutional.  Yet here in America, the Reid-Kennedy-Obama trio is pushing to pass and enforce this same type of "anti-free speech" law, despite their acknowledgment that any such enforcement would be unconstitutional in America too. (They why pass the bill in the first place?)

FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN CANADA

In Canada, where "hate crimes" laws already passed, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal actively forbid evangelical pastor Stephen Boisson from expressing his moral opposition to homosexuality. The tribunal also ordered Boisson to pay $5,000 "damages for pain and suffering" and apologize to the "human rights" activist who filed the complaint. His crime? In 2002, the pastor wrote a letter to the editor of his local newspaper in which he denounced the homosexual agenda as "wicked" and stated that: "Children as young as five and six years of age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights."  The Canadian government tribunal ordered the Christian pastor to "cease publishing in newspapers, by email, on the radio, in public speeches, or on the internet, in future, disparaging remarks about gays and homosexuals." (This "re-education commission" reminds me of Big Brother from Orwell’s 1984.)

FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN PENNSYLVANIA

Can’t happen in America?  It already has.  In 2004 my friend Michael Marcavage was arrested along with ten other Christians (including two elderly grandmothers), and charged with violating Pennsylvania’s "hate crimes" laws, because they carried signs conveying God’s love at a Gay Pride rally. One member of "The Philadelphia Eleven," Arlene Elshinnawy, 75 year-old grandmother of three, was holding a sign: "Truth is hate to those who hate the truth," before she was hauled off to jail by police officers. They were literally threatened with 50 years in jail for preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ on a public sidewalk, because it offended gays.  That hate crimes law was so outrageous it was later found unconstitutional by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, but now Ted Kennedy and Barack Obama want to pass essentially that same discredited law nationwide.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 88 MEMBERS OF HOUSE AND SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES, TO FUND F-22's AND STRIP "HATE CRIMES" OR AT LEAST KEEP THE BROWNBACK AMENDMENT.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sonia Sotomayor: 60% of Sotomayor’s Rulings Were Overturned By The Supreme Court

‘Judge Sotomayor will use her court seat to impose upon the nation the values of the National Council of La Raza (The Race), of which she is a member’

La Raza groups and allies must:

Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA


Dr. Paul Williams says, “…60% of Sotomayor’s rulings were overturned by the Supreme Court – - a fact, as Wendy Wright, president of the Concerned Women for America, notes that should cause legislators to “pause and take a good look at her record.”


When you think about it, Sonia Sotomayor is the perfect pick for the Supreme Court — in Barack Obama’s America.

Like Obama, himself a beneficiary of affirmative action, she thinks “Latina women,” because of their life experience, make better judicial decisions than white men, that discrimination against white men to advance people of color is what America is all about, that appellate courts are “where policy is made” in the United States.

To those who believe the depiction of our first Hispanic justice as an anti-white liberal judicial activist, hearken to her own words.

Speaking at Berkeley in 2001, Sonia told her audience, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion (as a judge) than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

Imagine if Sam Alito had said at Bob Jones University, “I would hope that a wise white male with the richness of his life experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Hispanic woman, who hasn’t lived that life.”

Alito would have been toast. No explanation, no apology would have spared him. He would have been branded for life a white bigot.

Judge Sotomayor will be excused because the media agree with her and she is a Latina who will use her court seat to impose upon the nation the values of the National Council of La Raza (The Race), of which she is a member.

Indeed, she sees this as her mission. Speaking at Duke in 2005, Sotomayor declared: “(The) court of appeals is where policy is made. I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law I know.” She and the audience joined in the laughter.

Who were they laughing at? Americans who still believe the role of judges is to apply the Constitution as the Framers intended and to interpret the law as written by our elected legislators.

In Barack Obama’s America, that is so yesterday.

Sotomayor’s support for discrimination against white males was on exhibit when Ricci v. DeStefano came before a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals on which Sotomayor sits.

Frank Ricci is the New Haven firefighter who, suffering from dyslexia but desperate to realize his dream of becoming an officer, quit his second job, bought $1,000 worth of books and had a friend read them to him to prepare for the crucial exam. He made it, coming in sixth among 77 firefighters, qualifying for promotion to lieutenant.

A problem immediately arose. Seems that of those who qualified for promotion, all but one were white, and he was a Hispanic.

Can’t have that. So, the New Haven City Council, under pressure from the usual suspects, threw out the tests, refused to promote Ricci or any white firemen, and called for new tests — to produce greater diversity.

In other words, get rid of at least some of those white guys who somehow managed to come in near or at the top of their class.

Ricci and 19 other firemen sued, claiming they had been denied the promotions they had won for one reason: They were white.

Red Sonja - Sonia Sotomayor

Red Sonja - Sonia Sotomayor

What did Sotomayor’s three-judge panel do with Ricci’s appeal of the district court decision that turned him down? She tried to kill and bury it in a single dismissive unpublished paragraph so Ricci and the white firefighters would never get a hearing in the Supreme Court.

Stuart Taylor, former New York Times Supreme Court reporter and a National Journal columnist, charges Sotomayor with engaging “in a process so peculiar as to fan suspicions that some or all of the judges were embarrassed by the ugliness of the actions that they were blessing and were trying to sweep quietly under the rug, perhaps to avoid Supreme Court review or public criticism, or both.”

Had it not been for the intervention of Judge Jose Cabranes — a Clinton appointee outraged that so momentous a case was being put in a dumpster — Sotomayor’s misconduct might never have been uncovered, and those firemen would forever be denied their chance for justice.

The process by which Sotomayor was selected testifies to what we can expect in Obama’s America. Not a single male was in the final four. And she was picked over the three other women because she was a person of color, a “two-fer.” Affirmative action start to finish.

Reading 30 of her opinions, GW law professor Jonathan Turley found them “notable” for “lack of depth.”

Liberal law professor and Supreme Court expert Jeff Rosen of The New Republic reports, after talking to prosecutors and law clerks, that Sotomayor covers up her intellectual inadequacy by bullying from the bench.

The lady is a lightweight.

What should Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee do?

Abjure the vicious tactics Democrats used on Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito. Lay out the lady’s record. And let America get a close look at the kind of justice Barack Obama believes in.

By Pat Buchanan

Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BREAKING: Pence Amendment To Stop Using Taxpayer’s Money For Recreational Abortions Fails: House Votes In Fact To Increase Tax Dollars for Planned Parenthood Abortion Cartel


Holding Hands From The Womb

Holding Hands From The Womb

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – After unexpectedly passing the House Rules committee late yesterday, an amendment introduced by Rep. Mike Pence to strip Planned Parenthood of its taxpayer funding under Health and Human Services “family planning” (or Title X) funds, has failed.

The House of Representatives rejected the Pence Amendment to defund Planned Parenthood by a vote of 183 to 247.

The Labor/Health and Human Services appropriations bill contains $317.5 million for the Title X Family Planning program (a $10 million or 3% increase over 2008 levels), which is a major source of funding for Planned Parenthood affiliates. Planned Parenthood is the recipient of approximately 23% of Title X Family Planning funds.

BabyFromGod

In 2008, Planned Parenthood provided nearly 290,000 abortions, accounting for approximately one in five abortions nationwide. The organization has recently come under fire for failing to report cases of statutory rape and for encouraging teen girls to lie to clinic workers in order to evade parental notification and consent laws.

“Representative Mike Pence offered an amendment to respect the will of the majority of pro-life Americans, the citizens who do not want their hard-earned tax dollars supporting abortion providers,” said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser.

“Our U.S. Government should promote real assistance for mothers that upholds the dignity of women and families, and doesn’t rely upon subsidizing abortions at every turn.”

Dannenfelser vowed to “use every available tool to educate pro-life Americans across the country about the result of this vote.” “Americans will know whether or not their representative voted on the side of the pro-life taxpayer,” she said.

via BREAKING: Pence Amendment Fails, House Votes to Increase Tax Dollars for Planned Parenthood.

9 Republicans Refused To Defund Planned Parenthood’s Abortion Cartel – While Obama Refused To Continue Employment of 95,000 Americans building The F-22 Raptor.

Apparently, The Socialists feel emphatic about employing those who destroy life and unemploying those who will protect our lives.  This is especially important, during a time when Bambi is diluting the American Dollar into Never Never Land So Aptly Called Stimulus.

In 2009 alone, and in only a 6 month period, 3.38 million jobs have been lost in America.

Both Obambi and McCain are out of their F’n Minds to disenfranchise 95,000 guaranteed jobs to American’s while loosing employment due to Obamabi’s Social Experiment.

Israel is the chief purchaser of the F-22 Raptor – both Obama and McCain need to be removed from politics.

With Israel supplying the revenue for the F-22, contrary to the lying Putative President that we are spending only our money, and allowing time to pass

to build an inferior F-35 is ludicrous.

With The State Of The Economy (Disappearance Of Shovel Ready Jobs)  - Even to Employ building with lincoln logs is better than diluting our USD with Bambi’s play money and watching 3.38 million Americans suffer needlessly. The shear lunacy gets even better, when bambi wants to give the banks an additional $50 Billion so as to lower mortgage rates. Thats more dilution (which assures more unemployment) and the unemployed already cannot take advantage of that. Lord Have Mercy!

partial_birth

THE 9 PRO ABORTION REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PENCE AMENDMENT ARE:

1. Biggert

2. Castle

3. Dent

4. Frelinghuysen

5. Jenkins

6. Kirk

7. Lance

8. Upton

9) Walden

09.12.09 National Taxpayer Protest Sign up for the 09.12.09 Protest at the Capitol!
It’s time to take the tea party movement directly to Washington, D.C. Please join thousands of local organizers and grassroots Americans from across the country as we gather in our nation’s capital to deliver a message to the politicians: Enough!We are gathering on 9-12-2009 to deliver our message in person that we’ve had enough!National Sponsor: Freedom Works

Taxpayer March on DC National Co-Sponsors:

Free Republic Club for Growth National Taxpayers Union Americans for Tax Reform Young Americans for Liberty Ayn Rand Center
Our Country Deserves Better PAC Campaign for Liberty Leadership Institute Grassfire Alliance Resist Net

Click for Free Republic threads on the March on DC!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Constructing Failed State --> Ushering The Excuse For Islamic Fascist Shariah Law --> Population Control - Cover For Housing Bubble Hedge Funds - Soros

Mexican Border Fiasco - Hezbollah Operatives

1) Iran’s Push Into Nicaragua.

2) Mexican Drug Cartels & Islam Working Together

3) Pelosi Reid Quiet: Hezbollah uses Mexican drug routes into U.S.

4) Mexican Hezbollah Drug War Now Worse Than Iraq

5)  Geneva Verge Of A Pandemic: HIV – AIDS – H1N1 Swine Flu – Islam Hamas Rampant In Mexico

Population Control

1) Petition: Senate Majority Nazi Muffin Leader Harry Reid

2) Geneva Verge Of A Pandemic: HIV – AIDS – H1N1 Swine Flu – Islam Hamas Rampant In Mexico

3) Obama: Sounds Of Death Warrant For Africans? – Punished If You Decide Against Abortion

4) Ayatollah Obama: Replace F-22 Raptor With Inferior F-35? (Too Late In The Game To Shut Down and then Rearm with inferior 35s). WWII – Admiral Nagumo Rearmed from Torpedos To Ballistic then back to Torpedos Loosing His carrier Strike Force At Midway.

5) Zip it – Obama Insists On Abortion Expense – The Most Preventable Medical Expense, Costs Americans $1.93 Billion/Yr

6) Cap & Trade Scheme: How The Deluded Voted

7) Harold Koh: Sharia Law, Soros Goon, And Obama’s Continued Attempt To Disarm The Constitution

8) Obama: Lets Stay Silent, Propaganda Can Be An Ugly Thing – I know, Lets Have A Spelling Contest.

9) RHRealityCheck.org: Abortion Money Cartel’s Propaganda Machine! ‘Burn Your Zippers’

10) Fuhrer Obama Wants To Send More Money Out Of Country : Foreign Aid Bill Pushes Abortion & Sodomy Agenda Overseas

11) Government Health Care Deception: Socialism’s ‘Wait Till You’re Dead Health Abuse’

12) More Briefs Surface Exposing Sotomayor’s Abortion Ties

13) Obama’s “Left Wing Class Warfare,” Positioning “America Against The Jewish State” Emboldens Left Wing Fanatics Such As National Socialist Holocaust Museum Shooting

14) The Socialist’s War on Science

15) Obama Condemns Murder Of Abortionist Dr Tiller, Murderer of 60,000 children – Obama Silent On Murder Of San- deela Kanwal Victim Of Islamic Fascist Teachings Of Honor Killings

16) Savage Sues Napolitano For Targeting Americans: Obama’s Leftwing Covert Operation

17) Pope Benedict Tells Pelosi: Catholics Must Oppose Abortion!

18) Dr. Alan Keyes Charges Fr. Jenkins with Abuse of Authority — Press Conference Held Today by those Arrested at Notre Dame for Sharing Pro-Life Message

19) Obama Pulls His Anti-DOMA Pledge From Presidential Website

20) Doctors Face Orders To Practice Eugenics

21) Sebelius’ Political Kickback: Blood Money From The Abortion Cartel

22) Sarah Palin Speaks Against Abortion At Indiana Right To Life Banquet

23) The Sebelius Wreaks Of Obama Corruption: Letter Reveals another $200,000 Donation from Notorious Abortionist Tiller to Help Elect Sebelius

24) Obama Requires Jesus To Be Covered, Or Removed Before He Will Visit. What Do You Feel, Love Or Hate From Obama?

25) Pope Benedict To Pelosi: Catholics Must Oppose Abortion

26) Obama’s Evil Hate Speech: Returning Troops Labeled As Rightwing Extremists

27) Leftwing Extremists Attack Those Who Defend The Constitution

28) The Sebelius Receives Kickbacks For Killing Kids

29) United States Physicians Opposed To Obama’s Mandatory Snuff Surgery

30) Obama: Allocates $16 Million USD To Affirm Your Choice Of Gayness – Social Chaos Divide And Conquer

Global Heat Fear

1) Ayatollah Obama: Bastardization Of USA Enters Final Phase

2) Obama Here To Dismantle America: Plundering For Socialists

3) 30,000 Scientist Sue Al Gore For Global Fraud: No Global Warming – NASA: Planet Cooling Since 2003

4) Scientists: Global Warming Claims Pure Superstition

5) Cap-and-Trade: Extorting The United States By Bubbles – Pure Hate Of Judeo-Christian Constitution

6) Rehberg On Cap & Tax: Obama To Smother Individual Power – Contrary To Everything President Lincoln Defended – Individual Rights

7) PETITION ====> Senators Urged To Quash Socialist ‘Cap & Trade’ Scheme

8) Bankrupting America – Dinars Or USD? : U.S. Citizens’ Need To Understand, Ayatollah Obama Is Diluting/Looting America

9) Obama’s ‘Scaremongering’: Scientists Condemns Obama Climate Report: Another Attempt At Funneling Our Money Overseas – ‘This Is Not A Work Of Science – It ‘Misrepresents The Science’

10) George Carlin: Global Warming Denier?

PETITION: An Open Letter To Our Nation’s Leadership

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Britain's Computerization For National Socialism's Health Service Has Been An Expensive Fiasco Allowing Failed State


Pleasure Island

Pleasure Island

Socialists like big systems: mass transit, yes; the individual motor car, no. A massive electric grid, yes; regional electric grids relying on informal arrangements among companies, no. A massive government health care insurer, yes; individual customers using competing insurers, no. It has to do with control. Use your car and you can go where and when you please. Use mass transit and you get on and off at stations selected by central planners at times their models tell them are optimal. Allow local control of electric grids, and individuals will decide on standards, construction needs and the like; replace them with a national grid, and those jobs and decisions move to Washington, to a Department of Energy that has never successfully completed an assigned task.
Worst of all from the Socialist point of view, let control of the health care system slip from the grasp of the central government and consumers will be confused by competing insurance offers, have to deal with doctors who might not recommend a one-size-fits-all course of treatment, or who just might order that extra life-saving test that bureaucrats relying on statistical averages deem too costly. The same sort of people who thought they could model financial risk and develop techniques to eliminate it, the people who confidently predicted that the president’s stimulus package would hold the unemployment rate to 8 percent, now have a way for us to save billions on health care: an Electronic Health Information Technology System. “Barack Obama and Joe Biden will invest $10
?billion a year over the next five years to move the U.S. health care system to broad adoption of standards-based electronic health information systems, including electronic health records.” So says “Organizing for America”–the reincarnation of the “Obama for America” campaign organization. If Messrs. Obama and Biden have that kind of cash to invest, more power to them. Unfortunately, they don’t.
So it’s to be taxpayer money, “the necessary federal resources to make it happen,” which is a somewhat different thing. Private investors would have an incentive to drop this massive project if it turned out that it was costing more than planned; government bureaucrats’ sole incentive would be to plunge on–to them, money is free, and job preservation, rather than efficiency-maximization, is the bottom line. Doubt that, and consider the unhappy facts of Britain’s National Health Service.
2679986148_ac42d17bb5.jpg
The goal of all this is scarier than the hubristic notion that construction of such a massive system is within the reach of even the most talented individuals. When up and running the IT system, we’re told, will reduce hospital stays, avoid unnecessary testing, require more appropriate drug utilization, and garner other efficiencies. But no “system” can do that. All it can do is provide central controllers with the information to enable them, instead of your doctor, to decide just how long you should be allowed to recover after surgery, whether you might be permitted to have the tests needed to make that decision other than by using broad statistical averages that ignore individual patient differences, and which medications are appropriate for you.
16_pinocchio
Sound extreme? Consider this further promise of the Obama organization: “Barack Obama and Joe Biden will require that [disease management] plans that participate in the new public plan .  .  . utilize proven disease management programs.” Patients suffering from diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and other chronic conditions will do it the Obama-Biden way or else be excluded from insurance coverage. And decisions about whether this is good medicine or not will be facilitated by the IT system, which, in the unlikely event that it works, would enable your doctor–and the system’s managers–to find out all about you by pushing a button. The judgment as to what to do by way of treatment will, alas, be made by people you have never met but who nonetheless can decide whether what your doctor recommends should be covered by insurance or is wasteful or contradicts the findings in the latest statistical study, perhaps reflecting the results of a small statistical sample of patients in Norway.
kicking_donkey 1
Obama has made much of the fact that we spend a much larger portion of our GDP on health care than do countries such as Great Britain, which have a state-provided system covering all citizens (and noncitizens who are taken ill in Britain, including illegal immigrants). Leave aside the question of whether a richer country such as ours, which has more completely met basic food, housing, and other needs (not to mention desires), should not properly spend more on health care than a poorer country. Consider only the fact that the
?method used to keep health care costs lower in Britain, Canada, and other countries in which the government controls the system, is a simple one: rationing.
In Britain until very recently an expensive medication designed to arrest macular degeneration could not be administered until the patient was completely blind in one eye. Cancer patients who decided to use their own money to pay for life-prolonging drugs not covered by the National Health Service (NHS) have been denied access to any treatment by the NHS, even treatment to which they were -otherwise entitled. In order to get the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to allow the NHS to make the breast cancer therapy Herceptin available, a number of patients had to take their primary care providers to court. The rationing system is quite simple: It is based on QALY, or quality-adjusted life year. As one expert student of the British system, actuary Joanne Buckle, put it, “New treatments that have a very high cost per QALY are not likely to be approved for payment because the health budget is limited.” Adding to your life span won’t get the product approved for payment–the committee has to deem that extra time of good “quality,” a decision made by people who likely have never met the physician who wants to administer the drug to an individual patient and who have not even a passing acquaintance with any individual patient.
In the event that Obama has his way with Congress and gets his health care plan and associated taxes passed, work will begin on the IT system–unless someone in the administration has the good sense to pop over to England and learn about the experience the government has had in getting a similar program up and running.
In June 2002, when England launched plans to computerize all medical records, it was hailed as a move that would set an example for the world. Many governments may dream of such a project, but Tony Blair had the apparatus to accomplish it. Britain has the National Health Service, a fully socialized health care system that pays 30,000 doctors to look after the country’s 50 million patients. It should have been straightforward.
images-4
Seven years later and the plans for the “NHS supercomputer”–as it has become mockingly known–have become a national joke. The project was due to be completed next year but the deadline is now 2015, and slipping. The original £6.2 billion (almost $10 billion at current exchange rates) cost of the project looks more like £20 billion (over $30 billion)–some now say it will mount to £50 billion ($80 billion), eight times the original estimate. And what few computer systems have been introduced have often served to bring yet more chaos to the NHS, not least in the form of the 8,000 computer viruses that were introduced into English hospitals last year.
It is easy to understand Blair’s motives. The NHS system was in urgent need of modernization, with about 660 million pieces of paper circulating in the system, many of them typed two or three times. Patients would sometimes die from wrong diagnoses, owing to missing or illegible paperwork. Blair argued then–as Barack Obama does now–that a new massive computer system would not just save money but save lives.
pinocchio_0
Fatally, Blair’s analysis did not go beyond that. Instead of a rigorous cost-benefit analysis, there were just statistics, many the same sort used in a RAND report on which Obama relies for his estimate of the savings waiting to be had. In a typical week, NHS doctors see 6 million patients, administer 360,000 X-rays, and dispense 13.7 million drugs. Surely computerization would yield handsome savings. This was as far as the logic ran. Ministers wanted to do this because they could. So alongside those digital patient records there would be a “spine” linking the various parts of the NHS system closer together than they had been at any time since nationalization in 1948.
This massive network soon became the flagship procurement project of the Blair government. Richard Granger, a former management consultant, was brought on board and made the highest-paid man in the British government ($400,000 a year)–more than twice that of the prime minister. Ministers were determined to sidestep the perils of central government computer procurement. This was one project, they said, that would not go over budget or deadline.
Granger certainly moved fast. Within a year he drew up and awarded contracts for what was (and remains) the largest civilian IT contract on the planet and produced four main winners from 160 bidders. Their prices–on average, half of their opening bid–were laughably optimistic. As work began, it became clear that they had no hope of meeting either the deadline or the budget. They wanted to renegotiate–and Granger played hardball. He lost.
The NHS turned out to be far more disparate than ministers imagined. Doctors and clinics come in all shapes and sizes, with different needs and priorities. Even in this socialized system, one size did not fit all–as the purveyors of this new computer system found to their sorrow.
Accenture walked away from its £2 billion contract three years ago, declaring a £260 million write-off. Last year, Fujitsu followed suit. Quietly, Granger quit too. His plan had failed. The British government is now reliant on just two companies for what is still the largest civilian IT contract in the world–BT Global Services and CSC of Virginia.
This left BT with the whip hand: If it were to drop out, then Britain’s entire NHS program would be run from the Falls Church, Va., headquarters of CSC. So BT has been able to negotiate far better deals, such as a new £500 million contract to pick up the work which Fujitsu left behind. This is in spite of BT’s being four years behind its own deadlines for installing computer systems in various London hospitals. Desperate overtures are being made to new bidders who might be able to get the program moving again. Costs are slipping out of control.
images-1
pinocchio
Meanwhile, the doctors and nurses are bitterly complaining that their shiny new software is no good, that it is designed for American hospitals, which bill patients whereas the NHS does not. The conceit of central government is again at fault: Little time, if any, was spent asking the people who would be using the systems what they want. As one doctor told lawmakers in Westminster, computerization of medical records is like “a juggernaut lorry going up the motorway–it didn’t really matter where you went as long as you arrived somewhere on time.”
While the records may still be years away, there have been achievements: digital archiving of X-ray scans, for example, and a new NHS email directory featuring 500,000 of its 1.3 million employees (more users than any email system in the nonmilitary world save Walmart and the Indian state railway). But few think this is worth the $7.4 billion already spent–especially as havoc has accompanied the introduction of the new system. One hospital manager is threatening to sue the government for the disruption the new records system has caused.
The NHS medical records program is now the subject of ridicule and embarrassment in Westminster, with aspects of its unintended consequences filling newspaper pages and television documentaries. Recently declassified documents show that Blair’s officials had warned about the inability to predict the costs of this starry-eyed procurement scheme. It was then, and is now, too big to succeed. Even for a supposedly homogenized medical system like Britain’s NHS, there are too many variables.
The Conservatives, likely to win power in an election next year, are of a mind to scrap as much of this system as they can–and then give hospitals freedom to choose whatever records system is best for them. This includes patient-owned records like the free-to-use Google Health.
Officially BT and CSC have been given until November to make progress on the patient record system–before being threatened with what the Department of Health calls a “new plan.” It is a threat unlikely to carry much weight. There is, of course, no new plan. The awful truth is that there was never a properly thought-out plan to begin with. Just a soundbite, a wing, a prayer, and an awful lot of wasted money that British taxpayers will never see again. The only promise kept is that the system does, in fact, contain a lesson for the world: Abandon hope all ye who enter here.
Development and implementation of a scheme appropriate for America would, of course, be enormously more complicated than any that would work in Britain’s highly centralized, single-payer health care system. Which just might be why the president finds the British model so attractive and wants to turn the U.S. health care system over to the tender mercies of the bureaucrats who will tell your doctor just what he may do to cure whatever ails you.
wizard2-1
Fraser Nelson is political editor of the Spectator. Irwin M. Stelzer, a contributing editor to THE WEEKLY STANDARD, is director of economic policy studies at the Hudson Institute and a columnist for the Sunday Times (LondSocialiston).SSC-ingresso-m
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shariah aka Islamic Fascism: Being Taught In California Public School 7th Grade Classes

Muhammad Killing Christians And Jews Since 600 A.D!
Muhammad Killing Christians And Jews Since 600 A.D!
Results Of Shariah Teachings
Results Of Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Rallying Islamic Kenyans To Support Islamic Fascist Obongo - Who Later carried Out Acts Against Humanity (Genocide) When He Lost
Rallying Islamic Kenyans To Support Islamic Fascist Obongo – Who Later carried Out Acts Against Humanity (Genocide) When He Lost
Sodomites Hung By Shariah Teachings - Though Pedophilia/Sodomy Is Ok For Mullahs
Sodomites Hung By Shariah Teachings – Though Pedophilia/Sodomy Is Ok For Mullahs

Obama In His Islamic Garb, Photo Held By Brother In Islam Kenya
Obama In His Islamic Garb, Photo Held By Brother In Islam Kenya
Mullah Shariah Teachings
Mullah Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings

Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings

Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings
Ordered By Shariah Teachings


Under some pressure from parents, California’s Education Department is reviewing its guidelines for teaching Islamic Studies to seventh-graders in its public schools. We wrote about this trend six years ago when we discovered that, though the California standards require the study of all religions, Islam is examined disproportionately.

Moreover, the more extreme elements of the more radically Islamic societies, though they represent a minority of a religion whose adherents are overwhelmingly peaceful, are ignored, no matter how visible their acts are. The latest attempt to revamp the California rules adds a new wrinkle to this approach.

For example, the treatment of Shari’ah law in the framework for Islamic studies developed by the California Department of Education is, to say the least, problematic. “Students learn how the Qur’an and the Sunnah served as foundations for the Shari’ah, the religious laws governing moral social, and economic life,” the suggested framework reads. “Islamic law, for example, rejected the older Arabian view of women as ‘family property,’ declaring that women and men are entitled to respect and moral self-governance.”

“At the same time, students investigate the role of women in Islamic civilizations.” One page later we get, “Muslim merchants came to operate from China to the Mediterranean, their trade facilitated by shared acceptance of Shari’ah law.”

Muhammad Killing Christians And Jews Since 600 A.D - Same Time England Outlawed Catholics For 300 Years. How Ruse!

Muhammad Killing Christians And Jews Since 600 A.D!

Yet all the available evidence indicates that Shari’ah law is hardly benign even in its present incarnation. “Major principles of shariah are a ban on interest, a ban on contractual uncertainty, adherence to risk-sharing and profitsharing, promotion of ethical investments that enhance society, and asset-backing,” Shayerah Ilias reports in a February 9, 2009 report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). “The international market for Islamic finance has grown between 10% to 15% annually in recent years.”

“Islamic finance historically has been concentrated in Persian Gulf and Southeast Asian countries, but has expanded globally to both Muslim and non-Muslim countries.”

Ilias is an analyst in international trade and finance at the CRS. As its name suggests, the CRS is a research arm of the U. S. Congress.

“There is a small but growing market for Islamic finance in the United States,” Ilias writes. “Through international and domestic regulatory bodies, there has been effort to standardize regulations in Islamic finance across different countries and financial institutions, although challenges remain.”

“Critics of Islamic finance express concerns about possible ties between Islamic finance and political agendas or terrorist financing and the use of Islamic finance to circumvent U.S. economic sanctions.”

Analysts at Shariah Finance Watch (SFW) , who track the application of the law in the world today, do not take quite so sanguine a view of it. A project of the Center for Security Policy, SFW examines how this body of law works in and out of the Middle East.

Ordered By Shariah Teachings

Ordered By Shariah Teachings

“Understanding Shariah law is integral to understanding the dangers of Shariah-compliant finance,” the SFW website argues. “Shariah law is Islamic law dating back to the 7th century and is today the law of the land in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan and the law under which the Taliban operates.”

“Shariah law authorities, some of whom are now being paid handsomely by Barclays, Dow Jones, Standard & Poors, HSBC, Citibank, Merrill Lynch, Deutschebank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Credit Suisse and others have the power to dictate Shariah compliance as deemed by ’scholarly consensus’ on matters of finance, family, penal law, apostasy, and war.”

“Shariah law, or Islamic law, officially went into effect in a region in Pakistan this week and will likely result in ‘egregious’ human rights violations,” the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) reported on April 16, 2009. The USCIRF went on to note that “Under Taliban-enforced shariah law in North West Frontier Province’s (NWFP) Swat Valley, human rights and religious freedom – especially for women and members of religious minorities – are expected to suffer severely.”

“The violent, Taliban-associated extremists based in NWFP’s Swat Valley consistently demonstrate their disregard for fundamental human rights, and use public beheadings and beatings as a means of enforcing their control,” Felice D. Gaer, USCIRF chair stated. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom was created by an act of Congress and gives “independent policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and the Congress.”

Results Of Shariah Teachings

Results Of Shariah Teachings

Those who have lived under Shariah offer even harsher assessments. “Sharia[h] laws are being used by terrorists to violate divine human rights,” Shaukat Malik, a Muslim-American Certified Public Accountant, wrote on The Baltimore Sun web log.

“Sharia[h] is used to scare the average citizen into submission,” he wrote. “This is done through publicly staged floggings, stoning and executions of men and women for committing adultery or other sexual acts.”

The California Department of Education is taking testimony today and tomorrow on its course revisions but if you would like to let them know how you feel about it, you can do so in the 60-day comment period that begins this weekend:

California Department of Education

Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division

1430 N Street

Room 3207 Sacramento, CA 95814

916-319-0881 or 319-0454

FAX 916-319-0172

Malcolm A. Kline is the Executive Director of Accuracy in Academia.  If you would like to comment on this article, please e-mail mal.kline@academia.org.

via Shariah Studies by Stealth.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Massive Immigration Bankrupting California | Illegal Aliens Cost California $13 Billion Dollars Per Year


Some banks and businesses in California are refusing to honor the recently-issued California IOUs. One news article reports: “Apparently, IOUs issued by an insolvent state aren’t as good as cold, hard cash. Last week, after state leaders failed to find a solution to an ongoing budget crisis, California began issuing IOUs to banks and other creditors. Now, despite initially agreeing to accept the IOUs in lieu of actual payments, some of the country’s biggest banks are refusing to honor the promises to pay.”

By honoring the IOUs, the banks are effectively agreeing to issue loans to millions of people in California. While this may not seem like a big deal now, just how many California IOUs would a bank want to have in its possession? These IOUs could eventually become the next big financial disaster –much like those loan bundles of minority subprime loans which suddenly became worthless. Maybe these banks already see the writing on the wall that California will go bankrupt.

The article notes “According to the Wall Street Journal, among the newly defiant banks are Citigroup (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Bank of America (BAC). Along with an announcement yesterday by Fitch Ratings that it had dropped California’s credit rating to BBB — just a few notches above speculative levels, this shift in sentiment puts immense pressure on Sacramento to find a lasting solution to the state’s woes.”

So far, the crazy socialist legislature of California still refuses to deport so much as one illegal alien. The Democrats refuse to even admit that illegal aliens take more from the state than they pay in taxes. Considering that illegal aliens either work under the table for cash, not paying any taxes, or they work minimum wage jobs, which pay almost no taxes, it’s hard to imagine why the Democrats continue to tell such obvious lies –except maybe that their liberal supporters are clueless enough to still believe them. The organization FAIR came up with an estimate that illegal aliens cost California $13 billion dollars per year.

090126-condom-pelosi4s.jpg

California is a huge state, with a massive population of essentially non-productive illegal aliens. Non-Whites make up a majority of the population of California, which is exactly what happens when White people gutlessly ignore the issue of immigration. There was a massive $15 billion dollar tax hike earlier this year, which is causing productive Whites to flee California en masse, pushing the state even closer to bankruptcy. California is leading the nation into a new age of financial insolvency. Productive White taxpayers can no longer pay enough taxes to support the crushing burden of a monstrously large non-White population.

Soon California won’t even be able to pay the police, the mercenaries who keep the lid on Los Angeles, Oakland and all the other minority-infested big cities. There could be massive riots soon as welfare programs go bankrupt, or California IOUs are soon turned down by everyone. We could easily be plunged into a race war in which Blacks and Latinos try to take by force, what a bankrupt state government can no longer give them.

via Massive Immigration about to Bankrupt California | The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Federation American Immigration Reform: Obama Allows Violence With Illegal Amnesty

FAIR: Obama Betrays Security for Illegal AmnestyWashington_Che_200

The country’s largest immigration reform group called the Obama administration’s massive illegal alien amnesty program a low priority that should take a back seat to security concerns.

"The American people have some very clear ideas about the priorities President Obama and Congress need to address, and a massive illegal alien amnesty isn’t one of them," Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) told Personal Liberty Digest.

"The public wants our immigration system fixed, but they expect their interests, not the interests of the people who broke our laws, to be paramount."

Stern, in an op-ed piece in the Buffalo News, wrote that international terrorist organizations have not given up their quest to attack this country. He said enacting a massive amnesty for nearly 13 million illegal aliens before securing the nation’s borders will exploit our vulnerability and could destroy infrastructure.

Stern called out Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., for stating in late June that securing America’s borders would have to wait until after enactment of a massive amnesty for illegal aliens. Schumer, who chairs the powerful Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Refugees, is predicting that sweeping immigration reform, including amnesty, will become law before the year is over.

“Unfortunately, Schumer and many in Washington seem prepared to use homeland security as a bargaining chip to leverage another massive amnesty for illegal aliens that the American public does not want and cannot afford,” Stern wrote. “In doing so, he and others are gambling with the security of the nation and the lives of innocent people.”

FAIR points out that since taking office, the Obama administration has abandoned enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.

che-guevara-communism-killed-tshirt

  •  In April, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during an appearance on CNN asserted that illegal immigration is really not a crime.
  • In late June, Obama told a group of bipartisan lawmakers that Congress should get a plan together by year’s end.
  • During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama promised to address immigration reform and make amnesty a top priority during his first year in office.
  • Last month, Obama said that America can't continue with a broken immigration system.
  • Obama said the current system is not good for American workers or U.S. wages; puts Mexicans who cross the border in danger; keeps undocumented workers exploited and in the shadows; and strains border communities.

    Stern said Schumer and others want to legalize millions of illegal aliens for political reasons and reasons of personal conviction.

    “Why, eight years after 9/11, do we not have operational control of our borders? And why should reasserting control have to wait for anything? Congress and the president have a moral and constitutional obligation to use all resources already available to protect the security of the nation,” Stern wrote in The News.

    “As chairman of the relevant subcommittee, and as an elected representative of the people who would most likely suffer in the event of another terrorist attack, Schumer has an obligation to put other considerations [such as amnesty] aside,” he added.

    “As a member of the House in 1986, Schumer was instrumental in passing similar legislation that granted amnesty to illegal aliens in exchange for government commitments to control future illegal immigration. Some 3 million illegal aliens got amnesty while the American people got fooled. This time, the security and interests of law-abiding Americans must come first.”

  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Rasmussen Report: 70% Believe Number of Homeless Families Will Increase Over Next Year Due To Obama’s National Socialism


    694.x480.otc.opener.obama

    Seventy percent (70%) of American adults say the number of homeless families in the country will increase over the next year, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just seven percent (7%) expect that number to decline, while 19% think it will stay about the same.

    Adults under the age of 50 believe more strongly than their elders that there will be an increase in homeless families.

    Eighty-eight percent (88%) of all adults are at least somewhat concerned that the number of homeless families will increase over the next year because of the troubled economy. Fifty-three percent (53%) are very concerned.

    Obama, Wright, Gore, Auchi, Soros, Edwards, Ayers, Rezko, Farrakhan, And Oprah: Wealth Spreading Redistributive Media Cons

    Just six percent (6%) are not very worried about a rise in homeless families, with five percent (5%) not at all concerned.

    Sixty percent (60%) of women are very concerned, compared to 46% of men. Adults who do not own a home are also more concerned than homeowners are.

    Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter.

    Seventy-one percent (71%) believe the housing market will only improve when the economy does.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Obama’s Cult Of The COLB: Scrub Internet Of All Traces Before Trial


    Putative President B.O.

    Putative President B.O.

    Yesterday’s item, “Fight the Smears Disappears,” documented the changes that have recently been made to Obama’s high-profile Internet site, “Fight the Smears,” and also to the Internet Archive, also known as the “WayBackMachine.com” — Obama has removed his bogus Certification of Live Birth from the Internet — at the same time, the Internet Archive just happened to “lose” its archived copy.

    What’s really ironic is that FactCheck.org is so invested in their defense of Obama’s bogus bona fides, that they just can’t dig themselves out of the hole they dug themselves into.  FactCheck now stands alone as a defender of the indefensible.

    In the last 24 hours, further evidence of an, organized, massive scrubbing of the Internet has been discovered.

    Evidence of this extraordinary campaign was posted on this site on June 18th.  Sometime between June 8, 2009, and June 18, 2009, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) changed the requirements for identification that they maintained for over 100 years.  All of a sudden, Hawaii will now accept Certifications of Live Birth (COLB) as proof of identification and residency, and will no longer require the certified “Certificates of Birth” — although Hawaii says that they will still take the traditional birth certificates.

    1) Defendant Obama

    2) Defendant Obama

    3) Defendant Obama

    4) Defendant Obama

    5) Defendant Obama

    6) Obama

    On June 7th, this website reported that the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu posted on its website a letter on White House stationery dated January 24th, in which Obama wrote, “As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi’olani Medical Center — the place of my birth — I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters” — even though Obama himself has previously claimed to have been born at Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu, a claim backed up by his sister Maya.

    Until June 7th, even United Press International (UPI) and Snopes.com contained statements that Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu.  Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, “Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center.”   Today, Snopes.com claims that “Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center.”  Snopes claims they made the change because Wikipedia made the change.

    Here is the UPI screen capture that claims Obama was born at Queens — but now the UPI claims Kapiolani.  Remember, Obama, himself, told UPI that he was born at Queens.

    So, because someone at the White House sent a letter to Kapiolani, all the websites that have been covering for Obama are now scrambling to scrub content that they have claimed as accurate for the last couple of years.

    Over one year ago, I wrote the following for the “Biography” page:

    On the Internet, there is an organized, systematic cleansing of Obama-related content.

    Every couple of days I get an email telling me this link, or that link, connects to a “Page not found — 404 error.”  The extensive body of Obama web-knowledge, that has evolved over the last 20 years, is shrinking.  Stuff that’s considered an Obama smear or unflattering is sent to the Obama ‘08 cyber shredding machine.  And the campaign is getting help from some really big web service providers.

    A good example is Kristof’s famous New York Times article, in which Kristof quotes Obama saying that 
    the Muslim call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth” and in which Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, “with a first-class [Arabic] accent” — that’s gone — from The New York Times — but it’s here though.

    And, the Trinity UCC website has completely changed.  Now, it’s all sweetness and light.  Gone are all those great Rev. Wright “God damn America” videos and anti-Israeli Trumpet magazine excerpts.

    There’s less on the web every day.  In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of Obama’s 3 bogus novels – Dreams From My Father” — “The Audacity of Hope” — and the latest — “Change We Can Believe In” — all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his “ghost-writers.”

    Obama has lived for almost 50 years without leaving any footprints — none!  There is no Obama documentation — no bona fides — no paper trail — nothing.  Just Obama’s taqiyya!

    Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released (lawyers’ fees = $2,000,000 ~ birth certificate = $15)
    Certification of Live Birth — Released – Counterfeit
    Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released (if one exists)

    Obama/Dunham divorce – Released (by independent investigators)

    Kindergarten records – Records lost (this is a big one — see here — read two frames)
    Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
    Soetoro adoption records — Not released

    Fransiskus Assisi School  School application — Released (by independent investigators)
    Punahou School records — Not released
    Soetoro/Dunham divorce – Released (by independent investigators)

    Selective Service Registration — Released – Counterfeit
    Occidental College records — Not released
    Passport — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser.
    Columbia College records — Not released
    Columbia thesis — “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament” – Not released
    Harvard College records — Not released
    Harvard Law Review articles — None

    Illinois Bar Records — Not released.
    Baptism certificate — None
    Medical records — Not released
    Illinois State Senate records — None
    Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
    Law practice client list — Not released

    University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

    via Barack Obama Latest News.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    United States: Catholics Fight First Islamic War Against United States For Over 200 years

    FIRST WAR AGAINST UNITED STATES

    The American Doctrine is I think best expressed by Abraham Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address. Reflecting on the horror of the war tearing at the fabric of the country, President Lincoln looks back to the historical and philosophical founding of the Nation: “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” The challenge facing the United States in Lincoln’s time (and ours) was not war as such, but whether the American “nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.”

    Reading over the years the work of the Catholic theologian John Courtney Murray, I have come more and more to appreciate the wisdom of Lincoln’s words at Gettysburg. Unlike other countries that are not united by land or blood.

    Contrary to her critics harsh words our failure to be faithful to our own ideals is to be expected. It is to be expected not simply because we are sinners, but and again as Lincoln points out at Gettysburg, because the American experiment is always an unfinished work. Whether in times or war or peace, it remains for each generation to answer in the affirmative Lincoln’s challenge to his listeners on that not so long ago battlefield:

    It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government: of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

    American Christian culture is I think demonstrating, to my second point, that E pluribus unum is a beautiful political motto. It is also at the heart of all human community Christianity. More than that, it is also at the heart of The Catholic Church.

    The American Doctrine, imperfect, icon of the Eucharist. Or to borrow from Hebrews, if the Eucharist is an image of the Kingdom which is to come then the American Experiment, seen in light of the Eucharist image, is a shadow of the image. And it is as a shadow, as something which points beyond itself to the image, even as the image points beyond itself to the Reality which is to come (see Hebrews 10.1) that Orthodox Christians can and should not only engage but wholehearted love and support the American Experiment.

    If we have as Orthodox Christians have been seduced by the identity politics that has come to so mark  contemporary American political discourse on both the left and the right, this doesn’t mean that we have to remain bound by our shared failure. Rather we can, if we only decide to do so, return not only to ourselves but return in a way that we can serve the common good of both the City of God and the City of Man.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Federal Reserve Growing Anxious: Warns Congress Not To Interfere

    obama_money.jpg

    The Federal Reserve warned on Thursday that a growing congressional threat to curtail its independence would destabilise markets and raise the cost of servicing US debt for “current and future generations”.

    Ron Paul, the Texas Republican, has gathered the support of a majority of the House of Representatives for a bill that would audit the Fed’s monetary policy decisions. He told a Congressional hearing he wanted the power to prevent the Fed being "secret and clandestine and serving special interests”.

    The Fed is struggling to face down a political backlash from different parts of Congress amid scepticism over its policies designed to restart the flow of credit and the award of new powers to curb systemic risks.

    Donald Kohn, vice-chairman of the Fed, argued at the House financial services subcommittee hearing that any sense of political interference would negatively affect markets. “Any substantial erosion of the Federal Reserve’s monetary independence likely would lead to higher long-term interest rates as investors begin to fear future inflation,” he said.

    Not only did Mr Kohn argue that the Fed should be given the power to regulate large systemically significant companies, but he argued against giving up responsibility for consumer protection, asking Congress to overturn the Obama administration’s proposal to create a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

    ”I would hope that the Congress might think about whether there are ways of strengthening the Federal Reserve’s commitment to consumer regulation as an alternative to creating a new regulator,” he said.

    As US authorities have considered how to reform the country’s regulatory regime in the wake of the current economic crisis, the Fed has been drawn into an argument with other regulators over who oversees the US’s largest financial institutions.

    The conflict appeared to end with the Obama administration giving power over systemically significant insitutions to the Fed, with additional oversight from a council of regulators including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    But critics in Congress have not given up an attempt to push all or more of the power to the council, taking it away from the Fed. The hearing on Thursday heard support for that view. Mr Paul’s audit bill now has more than 250 co-sponsors.

    via FT.com / US / Economy & Fed - Fed warns on Congressional scrutiny.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    MSU Indoctrinated Teacher Uses Governor Palin As ScapeGoat

    Indoctrinate

    Two years ago in June, Bridget Kevane, a teacher of Latin American Books and Latino literature at Montana State University, drove her three kids and two of their friends — two 12-year-old girls, and three younger kids, age 8, 7 and 3 — to a mall near their home in Bozeman. She put the 12-year-olds in charge, and told them not to leave the younger kids alone. She ordered that the 3-year-old remain in her stroller. She told them to call her on their cell phone if they needed her.

    And then she drove home for some rest.

    About an hour later, she was summoned back to the mall by the police, who charged her with endangering the welfare of her children.

    “Be quiet,” she was told, as she scrambled to explain herself, and a policeman threatened, as Kevane describes it in the current issue of Brain, Child: The Magazine for Thinking Mothers, “that if I ‘went crazy’ on him, he would handcuff me right in front of the children and take me away to jail for the night.”

    The children were fine — “smiling, eating candy” — or were, at least, until the police decided to make an example of their mom.

    The city attorney who took on Kevane’s case decided to do the same thing. She refused to hear of slapping Kevane on the wrist or accepting a guilty plea for anything less than “violating a duty of care,” a child endangerment charge punishable by jail time.

    Now, we can debate until we’re blue in the face whether or not Kevane should have left those three young children alone with the 12-year-olds. The pre-teens in question, it seems pretty clear, didn’t have the maturity to be entrusted with the care of younger kids; despite what Kevane calls their solid “experience” babysitting, they ditched their charges in the purse section by the cosmetics counter in Macy’s while they went off to try on some shirts, setting off the whole sorry adventure with law enforcement.

    That still doesn’t mean that Kevane’s error in judgment adds up to anything like child endangerment.

    The issue I want to take up today, however, is not that of tricky choices, or over- or under-involved parenting, questions that have already been discussed with much gusto elsewhere. What really sent my head spinning after reading Kevane’s story was the degree to which it drove home the fact that our country’s resentment, and even hatred, of well-educated, apparently affluent women is spiraling out of control.

    The prosecutor pursued her child endangerment case ultra-zealously because she “said she believed professors are incapable of seeing the real world around them because their ‘heads are always in a book,’” Kevane writes. “I just think that even individuals with major educations can commit this offense, and they should not be treated differently because they have more money or education,” the prosecutor wrote to Kevane’s lawyer.

    Kevane reflects, “I now realize that her pressure — her near obsession with having me plead guilty — had less to do with what I had done and more to do with her perception of me as an outsider who thought she was above the law, who had money to pay her way out of a mistake, who thought she was smarter than the Bozeman attorney because of her ‘major education.’ This perception took hold even though I had never spoken one word to her directly. Nor did I ever speak in court; only my lawyer did. I was visible but silent, and thus unable to shake the image that the prosecutor had created of me: a rich, reckless, highly educated outsider mother who probably left her children all the time in order to read her books.”

    This simmering resentment is common and pervasive in our culture right now. The idea that women with a “major education” think they’re better than everyone else, have a great sense of entitlement, feel they deserve special treatment, and are too out of touch with the lives of “normal” women to have a legitimate point of view, is a 21st-century version of the long-held belief that education makes women uppity and leads them to forget their rightful place. It’s precisely the kind of thinking that has fueled Sarah Palin’s unlikely — and continued — ability to pass herself off as the consummately “real” American woman. (And it is what has made it possible for her supporters to discredit other women’s criticism of her as elitist cat fighting.)

    The idea that these women really should “be quiet” comes through loud and clear every time. Men, you may or may not have noticed, are virtually never accused of “whining” when they talk or speak out about their lives. When well-educated, affluent men write about other well-educated, affluent men — and isn’t that what most political reporting and commentary is? — they are never said to be limited by the “narrowness” of their scope and experience. Well-educated fathers are not perceived as less real, authentic or decent than less-educated fathers. Even professor-dads, as far as I can tell, don’t have to labor to prove that they’re human.

    The idea that women with “major educations” are somehow suspect, the desire to smack them down and tell them “to be quiet” is hardly new. At the end of the 19th century, as increasing numbers of women began for the first time to pursue higher education, a campaign began, waged by prominent doctors, among others, against these new unnatural monsters, whose vital energies were being diverted from their wombs to their brains. In the last quarter of the 20th century, feminists were routinely delegitimized as brainy elitists ignorant of and unconcerned with the plight of ordinary women.

    It made no difference how much work groups like the National Organization for Women did on behalf of battered or economically powerless women. It made no difference how much advocacy was done for legislation promoting pay equity (a particularly acute problem for women at the lower end of the economic spectrum) or for affordable child care. The media — then as now — was interested only in more educated, more affluent women, and so it was these women who came to define the women’s movement in the popular imagination. And it was these women, too, who came to be identified with social change, and who came to be despised when that change proved frightening and difficult.

    This is why Palin — in her down-home aw-shucks posturing — is the 21st-century face of the backlash against women’s progress. This is why Kevane could be threatened and humiliated in front of her kids, menaced with jail time and ultimately railroaded into cutting a deal with the prosecution, once she realized she’d never be popular enough with local jurors to have a shot at making a successful not-guilty plea in court. (Paradox of paradoxes, as part of her deferred prosecution agreement, she was sentenced to even more education: in the form of a parenting class.)

    The hatred of women — in all its archaic, phantasmagoric forms — is still alive and well in our society, and when directed at well-educated women, it’s socially acceptable, too. Think of this for a second the next time you’re inexplicably moved to put an “elite” woman in her place.

    via Dangerous Resentment - Judith Warner Blog - NYTimes.com.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    DARWIN DEBUNKED BY SCIENCE

    Durwood Foiled Forever By Science

    by Paul Williams

    Darwin001

    Last January, Scientific American declared 2009 as “the year of Darwin” in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of the revolutionary evolutionist who turned man into a monkey.

    The celebration is understandable.

    No thinker has accomplished more to create a cleft between science and religion.

    No writer has done more to undermine the claim of scripture that man was made in the image and likeness of God.

    No scholar has forged greater support for moral relativity and modern materialism.

    His theories are treated as laws; his notions as knowledge; his speculation as science.

    But a recent finding in Kenya has sent evolutionists into a tail-spin.

    And freshly unearthed discoveries of Darwin’s life have caused the academic community to reconsider his greatness and his contribution to advancement of modern science.

    The first debunking of Darwin came with the discovery this year of a 1.5 million-year-old footprint in northern Kenya – - the oldest relic of primitive man since Mary Leaky discovered 3.75 million-year-old tracks in the volcanic ash of northern Tanzania.

    Darwinist scientists who the footprint discovered in Kenya reluctantly came to the conclusion that it was made by Homo Erectus who had no business appearing in the lower Paleolithic period of world history.

    By scanning the footprints with lasers and measuring sediment compression, the scientists determined that the individual who left this print had a modern foot and stride: a mid-foot arch, straight big toe and heel-to-toe weight transfer.


    footprintsml


    David Braun, a professor at the South Africa Cape Town University and one of the scientists who came upon the fossil, states the following in Sciencemagazine:


    It was kind of creepy excavating these things to see all of a sudden something that looks so dramatically like something that you yourself could have made 20 minutes earlier in some kind of wet sediment just next to the site. These could quite easily have been made on the beach today.”

    “The prints match a men’s shoe size of about 9, which gives you a height of about 5 feet 9 inches,” says Brian Richmond of George Washington University, who was part of the excavation team. “Here, we have really compelling evidence that they were walking with a long stride, they had an arch in the foot the way we have, and the arch puts a spring in our step, which makes walking more efficient,” he says.

    Compounding the problem was the discovery in the same area of a second set of human footprints that had been left about 1,000 years after the first set.

    “It’s incredible. I’ve never excavated anything like this before,” says team director John Harris of Rutgers University.

    The discoveries are not only incredible but devastating for Darwinists who have held that Homo Erectus did not appear on the scene until 200,000 years ago. This assumption is contained in almost every world history and social studies text in the United States.

    Since Christians are compelled by the U.S. Department of Education to present Creationism as a fanciful theory, the same ruling should now be applied to the questionable theories of Darwin and his contemporaries.

    darwin1

    To be sure, previous problems with the theory of evolution have been found. To support natural selection, Darwin argued that giraffes gradually grew long necks in order to reach into high trees for the leaves, which the Great Scientist believed, were their sole source of sustenance. He remained blissfully unaware that giraffes eat grass and bushes, and he failed to account for the fact that female giraffes are two or three feet shorter than the males.

    In their efforts to materialize empirical proof for evolution, Darwin’s followers turned to scientific hoaxes, such as “Nebraska Man” — an anthropoid ape ancestor to man, whose tooth turned out to belong to a wild pig, and Piltdown Man, who was reported to represent the missing link between monkey and man.

    Discovered in England in 1912, Piltdown Man created a sensation until the artifact was exposed in the 1950s as the skull of a Medieval Englishman which had been attached by jaded scientists to the jaw of an Asian ape, whose teeth had been filed down to look human and whose bones had been stained by shellac to look old.

    Yet three English scientists were knighted for Piltdown Man.

    Other Darwinian claims have been uncovered as asinine assertions. Bird feathers, for example, do not come from the scales of reptiles, human embryos contain no gills.

    Thus far, not one fossil has been found to validate Darwin.

    “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists,” admitted Stephen J. Gould in 1977. But that fossil record now contains even more species that appear fully developed, with no traceable ancestors.

    In addition to the discoveries in Kenya, newly uncovered data about Darwin the man present him as an opportunist and charlatan.

    Darwin, noted scientist Eugene Winchy demonstrates in his book The End of Darwinism, stole his theory from Alfred Wallace, who had sent him a “completed formal paper on evolution by natural selection.”

    “All my originality … will be smashed,” a distraught Darwin cried when he got Wallace’s manuscript.

    Darwin also lied in “The Origin of Species” about believing in a Creator. By 1859, he was a confirmed agnostic and so admitted in his posthumous autobiography, which was censored by his family.

    In his book, Windchy devotes a chapter to the Scopes trial which formed the basis for Inherit the Wind, a Bible-mocking movie with Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow and Frederick March as William Jennings Bryan.

    The trial, as it turns out, was a carefully orchestrated scam to garner publicity for Dayton, Tennessee.

    Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury.

    And the devout Christian Bryan more than held his own against the atheist Darrow as evidenced by the actual transcript of the trial.

    Tags: science  
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »